<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Evolutionary Ethics on Philosophie-Delor</title><link>https://philosophie-delor.github.io/en/tags/evolutionary-ethics/</link><description>Recent content in Evolutionary Ethics on Philosophie-Delor</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><copyright>Frieder Delor</copyright><lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0200</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://philosophie-delor.github.io/en/tags/evolutionary-ethics/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Philosophy</title><link>https://philosophie-delor.github.io/en/philosophy/</link><pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2026 19:38:41 +0200</pubDate><guid>https://philosophie-delor.github.io/en/philosophy/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This section contains my contributions to philosophy. Its main focus is ethics and metaethics, especially the development of a naturalistic and evolutionary ethics.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A central subject of my work is the is-ought problem. I examine why traditional and contemporary ethical theories fail to provide a satisfactory foundation for ethics, and develop a positive reconstruction on that basis.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The section also includes foundational work, critical essays, and reviews. Some of these texts use satire. The satirical elements serve to illustrate the arguments, improve accessibility, and provide entertainment. The underlying criticism is nevertheless meant seriously.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Ethics</title><link>https://philosophie-delor.github.io/en/ethics/</link><pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://philosophie-delor.github.io/en/ethics/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This section contains my work on ethics and metaethics. Its central concerns are the foundations of a naturalistic and evolutionary ethics and the solution to the is-ought problem.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Philosophy – Delor</title><link>https://philosophie-delor.github.io/en/</link><pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0200</pubDate><guid>https://philosophie-delor.github.io/en/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This blog deals with philosophy, with a focus on ethics, critical rationalism, and metaethics.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;At its center are book reviews, critiques of ethical schools, the is-ought problem, and a prescriptive evolutionary ethics based on critical rationalism.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Many texts are critical, some are satirical, and all are meant seriously.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Starting points:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="https://philosophie-delor.github.io/publications/"&gt;Publications&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; · &lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="https://philosophie-delor.github.io/about/"&gt;About me&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; · &lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="https://philosophie-delor.github.io/posts/"&gt;Blog&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Hume’s Is–Ought Problem and Its Solution</title><link>https://philosophie-delor.github.io/en/ethics/hume_is_ought/</link><pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://philosophie-delor.github.io/en/ethics/hume_is_ought/</guid><description>&lt;h1 id="humes-isought-problem-and-its-solution"&gt;Hume’s Is–Ought Problem and Its Solution&lt;a class="anchor" href="#humes-isought-problem-and-its-solution" aria-label="Link"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;h2 id="is-and-ought"&gt;Is and Ought&lt;a class="anchor" href="#is-and-ought" aria-label="Link"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;David Hume (1739/1978, T 3.1.1.27) observes in the &lt;em&gt;Treatise of Human Nature&lt;/em&gt; that moral philosophers often begin by speaking about facts. They write about what is the case, how people act, what properties they possess, or what conditions obtain in the world. Then, within the same argument, an “ought” or “ought not” appears. Hume notes that this transition often occurs without explanation. Texts begin with statements about what is and then move to statements about what ought to be, without explaining what justifies this new claim.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>