<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Philosophy and Science on Philosophie-Delor</title><link>https://philosophie-delor.github.io/en/categories/philosophy-and-science/</link><description>Recent content in Philosophy and Science on Philosophie-Delor</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><copyright>Frieder Delor</copyright><lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2026 19:38:41 +0200</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://philosophie-delor.github.io/en/categories/philosophy-and-science/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>A Reading List for Critical Thinking</title><link>https://philosophie-delor.github.io/en/philosophy/reading_list/</link><pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2026 19:38:41 +0200</pubDate><guid>https://philosophie-delor.github.io/en/philosophy/reading_list/</guid><description>&lt;h1 id="how-i-would-recommend-approaching-philosophy"&gt;How I Would Recommend Approaching Philosophy&lt;a class="anchor" href="#how-i-would-recommend-approaching-philosophy" aria-label="Link"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;h2 id="a-reading-list-for-critical-thinking"&gt;A Reading List for Critical Thinking&lt;a class="anchor" href="#a-reading-list-for-critical-thinking" aria-label="Link"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Philosophy reading lists often begin with Plato, continue through Aristotle, Descartes, Hume, and Kant, and then work their way through the history of philosophy toward the present. This makes sense if the main purpose is to study the history of philosophy. I do not think it is the best way to learn how to think philosophically.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>